Best Wireless Bluetooth Studio Headphones for Music Production [2024 Reviewed]

As an Amazon Associate ProRec.com earns from qualifying purchases. Any links that take you to products are affiliate links, and we may earn a commission if you make a purchase. We appreciate your support.

All text and image links lead to Amazon unless stated otherwise. All product scores are based on ProRec’s in-house scoring model

Thumbnail	Wireless Bluetooth Studio Headphones for Music Production	ProRec Score	Price
	beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless	9.3	Check Price on Amazon
	Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2	8.5	Check Price on Amazon
	Shure AONIC 50	8.1	Check Price on Amazon

Introduction

You will often hear that Bluetooth headphones are prone to latency, making them an inferior choice for monitoring or referencing purposes. People also hold the opinion that audio streamed over Bluetooth is bound to be compressed and the quality is subpar when compared to other wired offerings.

While there is some truth to the statements above, with modern Bluetooth standards and codecs, these issues are either nonexistent or have been minimized to a level where the difference is arbitrary. For example, If you opt for a pair that supports LDAC, you can get transfer rates up to 990 kbps. At this point the audio is barely compressed and the human ear is more or less unable to hear the difference.

Wireless studio headphones can achieve a latency of 34 ms which may not seem much until you compare it to a wired connection (which falls within the 5-10ms range). If you’re using a synth app with an iOS/android device and a pair of Bluetooth headphones, you may notice a delay. However, this is an easy fix! You can adjust the delay compensation settings in your DAW and have a latency free experience. It may take some work to learn the ins and outs, but once you do, you have the added benefit of working with wireless headphones.

In the past, battery life was a common issue with wireless headphones. However, most manufacturers now offer a battery replacement service that can breathe new life into your pair. With modern wireless headsets, you don’t have to worry about this for a long time. The batteries are meant to last, with a lifespan analogous to the battery life on an iPhone.

There are different kinds of headphones and wireless are no different. For recording or tracking, we recommend getting a closed-back pair as it eliminates sound leakage which can be distracting. However, in some instances you may have a bass build up which can be adjusted with playback settings. Closed backs are great for recording vocals or anything else that is miked.

Open-backs are the go to for a lot of producers (especially for mixing and mastering) as they have a better sound stage and a more natural sound signature. Regardless of the genre EDM, Rock or Metal, both open and closed back headphones are a staple in any studio setup and each present their own advantages and disadvantages. The one you choose to go with is simply a matter of preference!

Best Wireless Bluetooth Studio Headphones for Music Production Reviews

All text and image links lead to Amazon unless stated otherwise. All product scores are based on ProRec’s in-house scoring model

The Aonic 50 is a premium pair that is lightweight and features an awesome design. The headphones are enclosed in a metal frame with well finished plastic accents. The headband is soft and, along with removable ear pads, is wrapped in high quality leather, which we thought made the pair quite comfortable to use.

The Aonic 50 pair has relatively big drivers (50 mm) that provide a wide frequency range from 20 to 22000 Hz. It’s also compatible with Bluetooth 5.0 standard, offering increased range and stability. Additionally, the pair supports multiple codecs including aptX and LDAC that help reduce compression and improve sound quality. Furthermore, the built in battery on the Aonic 50 offers up to 20 hours of playback time.

The right earcup features two ports which include a 3.5mm jack and a type-C charging port. Both ports can be used for high resolution audio playback if you want to wire up your device. The active noise canceling feature has multi levels of adjustment allowing you to completely silence outside noise, whereas the environment mode negates the feature and lets it all in. You can also customize ANC modes, adjust the EQ and push updates all through the ShurePlus PLAY app.

In terms of sound quality, we found the sound signature to be balanced and natural. We felt that the bass reproduction was decent in every genre. Tracks sounded punchy and the details were well preserved in the low end. The Mid range also sounded clear especially due to the 70-300 Hz frequency bump. As a result, we had a pleasant time tracking through vocals and instruments which sounded granular and extremely detailed.

The high end is well executed for the most part, but some people may find it slightly forced and a bit overemphasized. However, it doesn’t produce any sharp spikes so you won’t experience any ear fatigue. Soundstage was decent for a closed back pair, but we would’ve preferred if it were a bit wider. Additionally, we couldn’t tell if there was any sound leakage since the earmuffs have a good seal and escaped audio gets easily drowned out.

The Aonic 50 has six built-in microphones, two for speech, and four for ANC. After testing the speech mics using the Windows playback feature, we noticed that they produce some static noise and sharpness on high frequencies. However, upgrading the firmware (to 0.4.9) improved the audio quality dramatically.

The Aonic 50 is the first headphone offering in the Aonic wireless line. They’re the immediate predecessors of the Aonic 40 which is a cheaper but less optimized model. Even though the Aonic 40s were released after the 50s they’re lesser in almost every aspect. For instance, the Aonic 40 features a flimsy plastic build compared to the 50’s much more durable metallic design. Additionally, the Aonic 40 features a weaker ANC which doesn’t provide enough isolation. The Aonic 40’s Driver size was also reduced from 50 mm to 40 mm which consequently lowered its upper end response from 22000 to 20000 Hz. Most importantly, the Aonic 40 doesn’t support LDAC which was a major selling point in the first generation Aonic.

While the Aonic 50 has no noticeable drawbacks, there is definitely room for improvement. For example, the unit has a bulky design with unfoldable hinges, making storage a bit cumbersome if you’re one to travel. Additionally, the built-in microphone would occasionally amplify background noise which can be annoying. Nonetheless we were able to overlook this since the firmware updates helped resolve the issue. Despite its great low end accuracy, punchier bass would’ve gone a long way in improving an already amazing experience.

All things considered, the Aonic 50 is an incredible pair of headphones that is relatively inexpensive. It has an amazing Sound and build quality which lives up to professional standards. We recommend the Aonic 50s for both casual users and artists since they offer so much for their asking price.

Shure Aonic 50 Benefits

They have Sound quality comparable to more expensive wired headphones

You could use them in wired mode through the type-C port or 3.5 mm jack

Active noise canceling allows you to use them outdoors while isolating you from the noise

Very comfortable even during long sessions due to the materials used and their light weight

Shure Aonic 50 Drawbacks

You can’t fold their hinges which made storing them a hassle

Microphone would amplify background noise which could be annoying

Low end frequencies could have been punchier

All text and image links lead to Amazon unless stated otherwise. All product scores are based on ProRec’s in-house scoring model

The beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless is an upper mid range pair with a solid build consisting of aluminum and high quality plastics. The headband and earcups are made of Alcantara which feels soft to the touch, making the pair comfortable to wear. The unit weighs a total of 0.88 pounds.

The headphones come equipped with 45mm tesla drivers with an impedance of 32 ohms. These drivers are housed in a closed back design that helps with noise isolation, sound leakage and bass enhancement. The frequency response on the Amiron Wireless ranges from 5 to 40,000 Hz.

The Amiron’s battery life is rated at up to 30 hours, which is slightly longer than your typical pair of wireless headphones. The unit can be recharged using the USB type-C port on the right earcup. Additionally, if you find yourself in a situation where that is not possible, you can still use the headphones in wired mode via the 3.5mm audio jack.

We found the controls very intuitive to use because of the touchpad on the earcup. Pairing the Amiron to our mobile devices was a breeze using NFC technology. The pair uses Bluetooth 4.2 and supports the following five codecs: aptX LL, aptX HD, aptX, AAC and SBC. We were able to personalize the EQ, push firmware updates and other customization through the Beyerdynamic MIY app.

The unit has a balanced sound profile, with a flat and natural feel, ideal for mixing. The sound stage felt spacious and wide, with adequate separation. Low end was accurate and although it lacked the punch that other closed backs offer, it still sounded bright and clear at all times. Mids sounded effortless and balanced yet full of energy and details. Low mids were a bit overemphasized however that helped highlight acoustic instruments and vocals. High end was fantastic and had good accuracy. While we found the low treble to be slightly lacking, it did improve the listening experience, as it reduced the harshness from brighter tracks.

Most importantly, the Amiron wireless had fairly similar quality in both wired and wireless modes. Most other headphones rely on digital signal processing to improve their sound which kills the quality when using them wired. However, this wasn’t the case here. Nonetheless, if you’re using them wired we still recommend that you drive them with an amp for optimum results.

The Amiron Wireless was released as a successor to the original Amiron which was a popular choice among music producers in the past. Design wise, the Amiron’s had a complete overhaul. The originals had an open-back design which provided a more natural sound. However, it decreased bass punchiness and immensely increased sound leakage. Based on our experience with the original Amiron, we wouldn’t want to go back to it at all. The sound quality while using the aptX LL codec was almost identical to the original, which is the main advantage wired headphones have.

Despite their exceptional audio and build quality, the Amiron wireless do have some shortcomings. For instance, We would have liked to see Bluetooth 5.0 instead of 4.2 for the extended range and reduced latency. However, we can overlook that as 30 feet was more than enough range in all our testing scenarios, and we were never distracted by the latency.

We also expected to see support for Sony’s LDAC which is as close as it gets to lossless audio. Nonetheless, we felt that it wasn’t that big of a deal since aptX LL comes very close. Additionally, we missed active noise canceling which would’ve made the pair more versatile. However, because of their closed back design, we were almost never annoyed by outside noises.

All things considered, the Amiron wireless is an excellent pair of headphones with a wide sound stage and balanced signature. The pair is comfortable with good battery life. We highly recommend the Amiron wireless as a top of the line wireless design.

beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Benefits

Their sound quality is almost indistinguishable from other wired headphones in the same price range

They are well built using premium materials which should last a long time

Using the headphones was very comfortable due to their light weight and alcantara material on the earcups and headband

They maintain their sound quality when you use them wired which is rare to see in wireless headphones

beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Drawbacks

Range and latency could’ve been better if the amiron wireless had Bluetooth 5.0

The headphones lack support for LDAC which would’ve been a nice upgrade for professional use

The Amiron wireless do not support active noise canceling which may affect their usability outdoors

All text and image links lead to Amazon unless stated otherwise. All product scores are based on ProRec’s in-house scoring model

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 is an excellent pick from the Audio Technica’s Bluetooth headphone line. It is a budget pair housed in the same premium closed-back plastic and metal signature design as the M50x. The headphones weigh 0.67 pounds, which is relatively lightweight.

The ATH-M50xBT2 is equipped with 45mm drivers and has a respectable frequency response of 15 to 28000 Hz. They also have a rated impedance of 38 ohms and can be driven for 50 hours straight using the built-in LIPO battery. This puts the M50xBT2 among the longest lasting wireless headphones in the market. A full charge only takes 3.5 hours through the USB C port and plugging them in for just 10 minutes can provide you 3 hours of use.

The ATH-M50xBT2 features a Bluetooth 5.0 connection which means that you won’t face any noticeable latency. The integration of optimized LDAC/AAC and SBC codecs also means that they retain excellent sound quality with minimal degradation due to compression. The unit features 4 control buttons which include a dedicated voice assistant button which also mutes the mic when on call, the center button which serves as a power and a pause/play button, and the + and – buttons which are used to skip tracks, change volume and pair the headphones to a device.

Sonically, we found the M50xBT2 to be balanced, pure and natural, at a level rivaling its wired variant. Instrument separation was evident. The sound stage felt very wide which made it easy to locate instruments in stereo mode because the signals had more spacing between them.

On the low end, despite their balanced tuning, the bass reproduction was punchy and powerful. The midrange felt natural, with highlighted details and centered voice positioning. The instruments sounded clear and the vocals were elevated. The high frequency range was detail rich with plenty of energy. Audio Technica was able to achieve this flat sound signature without adding sharpness which allowed us to use this pair for extended sessions without fatigue.

In comparison with ATH-M50xBT, the newer generation outperforms the 40 hour battery life of its predecessor by ten hours. We were able to comfortably use the headphones for several days on a single charge. However, that was a minor improvement. The sound on the previous model felt harsh and clipped, which is not true at all for the current version.

The original model also suffered from exaggerated bass which made the pair not the best choice for music production. However, the newer model has a flatter tuning that gives the pair a natural sound. Finally, the pairing process which was a major complaint in the first generation has now been improved greatly and is now seamless and quick.

No product is ever perfect and the ATH-M50xBT2 is no different. The headphones have some heat buildup and fit issues, however, we were able to resolve these issues by replacing the earpads with more breathable ones, and stretching the head band overnight.

Another downside is that the ATH-M50xBT2 does not feature active noise canceling which may be an essential feature for some. However, as its been proven in plenty of other wireless headphones, it was a necessary sacrifice as tuning becomes incredibly more involved with ANC which is why most companies don’t bother doing it right. Furthermore, the ATH-M50xBT2 passively blocked out most of the noise due to their design and outside noise was never a concern.

Overall, we found the ATH-M50xBT2 to be a great budget wireless pair. The unit features a good Bluetooth standard with minimal latency. The wireless sound quality is comparable to more expensive wired headphones and the 50 hour battery life is outstanding. Highly recommended!   

 Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Benefits

The headphones provide a balanced sound signature and wide soundstage with excellent quality

 The pairing process is very intuitive and quick

 At only 0.67 pounds these headphones are lightweight making them comfortable for extended use

 The headphones have one of the longest battery lives in the industry which is also supported by quick charging

  Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Drawbacks

The headphones lack active noise canceling which is a necessity for some

They can get uncomfortable after a heat builds up due to the earpads’ materials

The headband feels tight out of the box which may affect your long listening sessions

Verdict

Based on our scoring model, you can see that the highest varience is in the Build Quality, Frequency Response and Sound Quality categories. All three pairs sounded pretty good but the Amiron and M50xBT2 were the ones that stood out. The Amiron has the best build quality which is expected since it costs twice more than each of the other two pairs. The Aonic 50 came in second as it has a solid build but with less premium materials. Frequency response was another win for the Amiron even though the other two pairs also had respectable ranges.

Compared to its competitors, the Beyerdynamic Amiron was fairly consistent throughout our tests. It comes out on top in every category except for price to performance and comfort, where it ties with the Aonic 50. While the Amiron had a low score in the price to performance category, it still managed to get an 8, which really isn’t bad at all. The M50xBT2 and the Aonic 50 just have a lot more to offer given their low price tag.

The M50xBT2 and the Aonic 50 are both solid options. The ATH-M50xBT2 was able to compete in most categories. The pair provided incredible value for the price, making it an excellent choice if you’re on a tight budget. Furthermore, it has the longest lasting battery life that allows you to use the pair for multiple recording sessions on a single charge. The Aonic 50 is also a great choice because of the solid build quality and comfort, both of which were comparable to the Amiron at half the price.

However, based on our testing and the results of our scoring model the Beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless is the headset that comes out on top. It offers an exceptional build that is both comfortable and long lasting. It also leads in audio quality with a score 9.5. The pair’s sound signature was both natural and balanced with a wide frequency range all of which are ideal for music production. The cans also offer an amazing upgrade from the original Amirons by going wireless without sacrificing any of the attributes that made the first generation so great. With the addition of its long battery life, the Amiron wireless becomes an all around amazing pair that we can safely recommend as the best wireless bluetooth headphone for music production, no matter your use case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I get an Open or a Closed back Bluetooth/Wireless headphone for music production?

For recording and tracking closed back are the go to as they generally have little to no leakage. Open-back excel in production, mixing and mastering as their sound is more natural and does not suffer from bass build-up. Both open and closed-back cans have their place in a studio, however if you could only choose one we recommend going with an open back pair as they’re more versatile.

The Bluetooth/Wireless headphones are at different price points, which one should I get?

In most pairs price will reflect quality, the higher you go the more features you’ll get. However, that is not always the case. You can certainly find headphones at half the price of top of the line cans that still have most of their qualities. Picking the right pair depends on your budget, your use case, personal taste and the features you’re after.

Will I lose quality or face any issues with Bluetooth/Wireless headphones?

With recent Bluetooth standards and codecs, quality and latency are no longer as big of an issue in wireless headphones. Latency can now go as low as 34 ms in more premium pairs which is barely noticeable. As for quality, LDAC and aptX codecs have significantly reduced compression and preserve the original audio to a good degree. It is a fact that a wired connection will yield better results. However, wireless headphones have reached a point where they’re proposing a competitive alternative.

Do I also need Studio Monitors in addition to Bluetooth/Wireless headphones for music production?

In a proper studio setup, headphones coexist with studio monitors as each have their role in music production. While there is no way around a good pair of studio monitors for professional mixing and mastering, quality headphones are a good tool for referencing. Any serious music producer would use a combination of both.