Jul24Written by:Jonathan Grand Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:56 PM  Like a fast growing teenager from a broken home, the music industry has been tortured by painful and unexpected changes, finally learning how to survive on its own. Today, major labels are the melancholic parents in denial, missing the old days of sense of ownership. They are still in control, suffocating the market transformations as much as they can. But they are losing the game, and they know it: capitalism in the hands of the little ones is a doomsday device against the corporations - "Indie" is a commonly used abbreviation for Independent music, and that means independent from the pseudo-corporatism of major labels in the areas of recording, production and publishing. Indie bands like Sonic Youth and The Pixies rose to alternative audiences when the music industry started turning into a commercial monopoly, and the somewhat recent MP3 file sharing tendency re-ignited the war between the ones with power and the ones with talent. Since then, things have changed.
The word “Indie” is now often used to represent a music genre. These artists are still independent in the true meaning of the word, but for different reasons than you might expect: the do-it-yourself approach is now maintained, not by sheer rebellion against the establishment, but because the artists themselves are now in control.
Independent labels helped this transformation, but today's market evolution is also leaving them behind. All because of a fusion of musicians and business - more and more, artists are producing in their own home studios, or creating indie labels of their own, to represent themselves (and occasionally a few other bands) in production and promotion.
What would this mean to music?  Some (mostly big budget labels) believe music, as a business, will become less profitable for top Billboard artists – a breed of entertainers that could very well end up limited to the performers made famous by TV shows like American Idol.
Young bands would benefit from the accessibility to cheap home studio gear (specially if they have enough knowledge and ears to engineer it themselves, or find a good amateur producer/engineer), and cheap publishing (downloadable songs in online stores, without the need for CD printing, packaging and shipping).
This could become the time when garage bands start feeling the need to either get ready to take things seriously as business owners, or find a day job. Because of that, younger artists would not consider music as much, or as early on. More selective and mature musicians would probably have some impact in the way music is created.
But what about promotion? Even in the age of MySpace, big labels have the money and the business connections to pay for MTV and radio plays. That gives them a significant edge. If for some reason they stopped existing, then the system would change completely. But no one knows for sure if they will.
(As you might have realized by now, despite the title, this is not a rant about the decreasing quality of Indie music today. There is an interesting article on that subject, available online - “Does the world need another indie band?” by Tim Walker for The Independent.)
What would this mean to engineers and producers?  There is some concern about how this will affect the studio environment, in both high and low budget levels. It's quite possible that B-list professionals will start getting more work. Music production will become a cheaper good, making the business more profitable for small studios. Simultaneously, that environment would be more welcoming to lower quality work – just enough to make the customer happy – since it would not be motivated by (relatively) generous payments. And maybe even seasoned producers would need to adopt this rather unsatisfying work method.
With enough market competition, we could start seeing production companies or independent professionals dedicated to delivering template-based, quick song mixes for extremely low prices.
Chronologically, this happened first to design (web and graphic), it might happen now to music, and could eventually happen to the film industry as well. It's an alarming possibility that should be considered. Still, it's very unlikely that things will get out of hand: today we have template-based web design, but that doesn't mean designers are out of jobs. What remains is a lot of ignorance towards the employers to pick the best professionals (since they are usually not too experienced in artistic fields).
An undeniable bonus, in this new world order for the music industry, would be a fair talent ranking: the ones with more musical, recording and publishing skills would be on top – and not so much the ones with money (although those would never stop getting radio plays, defeating the whole purpose.)
Conclusions?
Another possibility is to also see an exodus of studio professionals towards jazz and classical (mainly film scores). Since those genres will always need extreme care, for precision in production or bigger budget purposes, the industry might not look as dark for professionals after all.
Despite the parallel made between design, music and film businesses, what usually happens is that teams are needed to achieve the results. And since it's never really a one-man-job, high quality production environments stay alive, because they usually end up being more profitable and pleasurable for everyone involved.
Despite the complaints of major labels about the state of the post-MP3 market, the film industry is also victimized by tons of DivX downloads. Some movie industry analysts predicted, a couple of years ago, that big budget summer blockbusters would disappear, and guess what? They're still becoming increasingly profitable, and since 2006 we've had the biggest record-breaking box office sales ever registered. So I would bet we're still going to see a lot more Batman sequels and remakes before things start going down.
Obviously, no one knows the future - specially the future of music in these days of violent transformations. I'll gladly write a follow-up to this analysis after more time of reflection and information gathering about how exactly things will end after the MP3 vs. Labels war is finished.
Jonathan H. Grand is a singer/composer with a wide experience in music, arts and entertainment. He can be reached at info@jongrand.com Tags:7 comment(s) so far...
Very well written! By Mattman on
Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:25 PM
|
Nice article. But what hit me was the first sentence of your conclusion, because I've just started to work on 2 jazz projects after dealing with pop and rock for so many years. :) By ilteraktif on
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:52 AM
|
I think you have some extremely vaild points concerning the music and entertainment industry. I have to say that the advent of technology with CPU speeds has dramatically shifted the face of what can be done and what no longer is deemed needed. When I started to take an interest in music production back in 1991, putting together a professoinal demo meant saving up tons ($1000's) of money to go into a commercial studio, and recording to 2 inch 24 track reel-reels. Now, even an "old" P4 laptop runs circles around what could be done in a commercial studio even in 1997, let alone 1991.
But in a way that has also been a curse, because now everyone with a $400 computer and a copy of Cubase or Pro Tools calls themselves a producer. Or better yet, they buy a $300 VST and call themselves a mastering engineer. Amazing to me how many people I've spoken to that have actually said to me "why do I have to know music in order to make music?" Imagine someone saying that in 1950, 1960 or 1970! Or, when Beethoven was alive! Don't get me wrong, I believe the current music technology is a GOD send, it has definitely afforded me the tools to write and create the music I have in my head, bu it has also contributed to a plethora of garbage and a apathy in studying the craft. By DAS on
Friday, December 26, 2008 10:31 AM
|
Hey DAS, thanks for the comment :) You're absolutely right, too easy access to resources is always a curse in some ways. And I have seen a lot of people (even in professional circles) relying in their knowledge of a software program to call themselves audio/recording/mixing engineers - and getting jobs with their resume/references! Still, just to see things from a different angle, the bad music we see in the top charts (have you seen Rolling Stones top 100 singles of 2008? Some picks are almost offensive) are still produced with a millionaire budget. And for some reason, so is the "new indie" pop/rock that invaded radio stations. We might be at a turning point where we need to look sharp for real professionals hiding among the overnight engineers.
I think culture in the US has been reversing since the late 70s. A return of conservative ideas and religion might be the reason for the hibernation of a more liberal and rebellious culture that was so beneficial to music, and arts in general. Lets face it - something went wrong at some point - people (and specially youth) used to be more open about sex and marijuana, more interested in world politics, and more engaged in music as cultural window. Where have all the intellectuals gone now? To Europe? (jk) By Jonathan Grand on
Friday, December 26, 2008 3:26 PM
|
Yeah, I do believe that a lot of what was american culture in past decades heavily influenced the music scene. To some degree, music is just an extension of social life for artists and musicians anyway. And as I've already said, I think techonolgy is one of the best tools we've experienced for music recording and production. But it made soo many people lazy for the craft and art. If you really wanted to be a phenomenal songwriter before, you had to really learn music theory and some other things, and/or learn to play an instrument such as the guitar or piano.
But you know, in order to do those things takes time, lots of time, dedication, and discipline. And those that actually accomplished that for the most part were good, because they were hungry for the achievement. Now, computers take away the wait. We're in a microwave age now, which is very indicative of our music.
To be honest with you, I don't have a clue of what the top 100 singles are for 2k8, because I gave up on listening to the radio or looking at the Grammy's for many years now. Sad, but the ones that really seem to put the time into their craft get soo overlooked for garbage too often. But I do see a shift in trends for the better as well. All is not lost. One thing about garbage, eventually it does stink. By DAS on
Monday, December 29, 2008 11:13 AM
|
Is "specially" a correct use? I only heard especially before... By John Doe on
Saturday, August 22, 2009 2:09 AM
|
It's not incorrect use - both specially and especially can be used to mean "particularly" or "in particular". Quote: "In the sense of "particular" or "particularly," the words mean pretty much the same thing. Often they can be used synonymously."You might favor one way over the other - that doesn't really make it wrong in contemporary English.
"http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000287.htm" . "http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specially" . By Jonathan Grand on
Saturday, August 22, 2009 2:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|